Here Charitable Individualism is the key!… nothing less.

ZARDARI & HIS STATEMENTS!!


ASIF ALI ZARDARI , who by quirk of fate is the President of Pakistan, is the only political person in this world who has donned the mantle of an assassinated wife. He was known as 10%-er, for all the backroom support he was providing when his wife was holding office.

Had he stepped boldly, into the shoes of his assassinated wife, one cud atleast say that he wanted to carry on the democratic process initiated by his wife, but the slime-ball techniques that he exhibited by projecting their son as the heir and assuming power as a REGENT PRESIDENT, is to say the least pusillanimous.

Not only his mode of assumption of the President’s post is dubious, but his statements are PREPOSTEROUS. No Indian Prime Minister, nay even a Chief Minister of a state in India, would go public stating that a person, captured for any criminal activity, does not belong to the nation or the relevant state within 12 hours of the question arising. India has @ 600 districts and each is headed by a District Collector / District Magistrate and without their report, no Constitutionally appointed person would make a statement of fact, as time could reveal facts and also show that he was in the know of that fact. But our WIDOWER, makes a statement disowning Kasab @ Qasab, as not being a Pakistani, unmindful of the future possibility of him being exposed. At least he could have asked the Chief Minister of the province to make a statement and back it up as the president.

The latest one is that THERE IS A PART OF PAKISTAN IN EVERY INDIAN!

Dear Zardari, u r like the frog from the well which could not conceptualize an Ocean.

FIRSTLY, if one has a look at the map of Pakistan one can see that no part of Pakistan is more than 500 kms from the nearest territory of India. Whereas, India cannot be covered from Northern end to the Southern Tip by an overnight journey! Nor can the East to west be traversed by an overnight journey! 500kms is nothing but an overnight journey. And these distances are not filled by vacuum, but amazingly variegated culture.

SECONDLY, Mr.Zardari, out of all the languages spoken in your land Urdu, Punjabi and Sindhi are languages which are merely 3 of the 22 languages listed in Schedule 8 of The Constitution of India. These 3 languages form probably the mother tongue of less than 5% of the population of India. Yet Zardari has the AUDACITY TO TELL THAT THERE IS A PART OF PAKISTAN IN EVERY INDIAN.

THIRDLY, India is not a THEOCRATIC state- neither by its Constitution nor by its Practice. There are INSTITUTIONS that stand by the CONSTITUTION and HUMANITY. It is the land where the APEX JUDICIARY INVENTED THE BASIC STRUCTURE DOCTRINE AND OVERCAME THE CONFLICT BETWEEN FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES, thereby had resolved conflicts thru fine judgments and refinement of thought and not thru crass force and muzzling!! The very composite nature of the society has brought a tolerance, which for a common Pakistani to appreciate might take ages.

FOURTHLY, if Zardari thinks that India is made up of the border districts abutting Pakistan, he is grossly mistaken. There are ethnicities that are diametrically different to his country’s ethnicity.

FIFTHLY, maybe India has been exporting Hindi Movies for the entertainment of the Pakistani people and Pakistanis might be influenced by those movies to such an extent, as to believe that, that was all India was about. If that were to be so they are grandly mistaken. There are movies made at a serious level in at least half a dozen more languages, which reflect cultures beyond their understanding!!

SIXTHLY, Pakistan has a population less than that of Uttar Pradesh (the most populous state of India) and India has more Muslim population than that of Pakistan. The dimensions that we are talking here are incomprehensible for a leader from Pakistan.

SEVENTHLY, at best a Zardari could qualify to be treated at par with some of the Chief Ministers of the major states of India, had it not been for the sovereignty of Pakistan.

Therefore, if he cannot get his facts right and be HUMBLE, the least he could do is to refrain from making those insidious statements, as if every Indian is carrying a part of Pakistan as a royal vestige!! The People’s power and the strength of the Institutions of India are incomparable, and its multi-culturalism, unparalleled.

Comments on: "ZARDARI & HIS STATEMENTS!!" (5)

  1. …making a statement with regard to the identity of qasab without due process is well taken; not raised by these elite news channels..

  2. a unique observation, indeed!!

  3. Could u share your opinion with regard to the “diplomacy” over the whole “bombay attack” issue..
    Why is only the identity of qasab is being highlighted..media reaching his village..”
    What about other nine killed..I hope even they belong to pakistan, aren’t they…why not talking about their origin, village, parents, etc

    • as regards the other nine, the statement of Kasab cannot be relied upon as, if he were to give out wrong details 1) kasab himself might have been kept in the dark about others and he might be repeating what he had been informed- which could lead to discrediting Kasab’s statement as a whole. 2) kasab might not be able to come up with details of others which cud be exclusively within the dead man’s knowledge, 3) if pakistan denies the facts, we have no recourse to the dead men to disprove the claims of pakistan. 4) we shud not give a handle to the pakistan to prove that we don’t have the facts and thereby allow them to sidetrack the issue and DISCREDIT kasab’s statements about himself and his activities. 5) since Kasab is already in the custody of an alien hostile/ unfriendly country, we have to stick only to incontrovertible facts. 6) kasab has hopes of being alive, therefore his parents may come out in the open, but the relatives of the dead have no such hopes, so they’d prefer to be silent on their dead terrorist relatives. 6) we talk too much, we shud not try to impress piddly unorganized neighbours with facts- that is my gratuitous advice!

  4. DIPLOMACY is something which takes the colour of the relationship inter se the parties; and has a meaning which could be interpreted as situations evolve so far as the observers are concerned. Goebbels-ian propaganda was war time diplomacy and the missions which function in other countries are merely to facilitate COMMUNICATION that can be interpreted by the corps lying abroad for the sake of their nation.
    DIPLOMACY is essential, when one is not ruthlessly powerful, all that is not needed when u have the power to pervert the UN and have the striking capacity. To get into Nicaragua, the US did not indulge in much diplomacy. Diplomacy means different things to different nations. For Chengiz Khan his envoys wud issue an ultimatum to surrender, if that was heeded no plundering, pillaging, arson and rape; if not the diplomacy has failed and then Chengiz lets loose the army.
    Diplomacy according to me is the settlement of the superiority thru peaceful means and if it fails, the parties ignore each other or go to fight and settle the superiority thru arms. Diplomacy is VISIBLE STRATEGY, we as watchers of the news are carried away by it, but behind that is the WILL of the Government, which can take any direction.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: