Here Charitable Individualism is the key!… nothing less.

MUMBAI TERRORISTS!


In the TV Channel HEADLINES TODAY, there was an eminent panel of Analysts which included 2 foreign INTELLIGENCE  ANALYSTS.  When  asked  whether  HOT PURSUIT  was  an option for  India,  they  said that on two grounds it was not advisable:-

1. That hot pursuit was successful when the host country was friendly, and

2. That it was a collective belief, of the Indian nation, that the terrorists came from a neighbouring nation and one had to have more concrete material to act upon such a premise.

In the INTERNATIONAL LAW, hot pursuit is allowed when the mischief-maker moves into alien territory subsequent to the mischief done by him. This provision is allowed, as the rights of the victim nation need not be deterred by niceties when they can apprehend the mischief maker, even when he had entered the alien territory.

INTERNATIONAL LAW IS MAN MADE like any other law, but that the precedents are not of great relevance. History may be of relevance, i repeat, but PRECEDENTS ARE NOT BINDING.

Therefore when  BUSH and BLAIR invent the WMDs based  on the  so called facts  submitted  by the CIA  chief,  and act upon it, a  third world country  which has  proof  is, international opinion-wise prevented from  launching  an attack to DECAPITATE the head of the terror outfit outside its territory!

We have to learn the un-highlighted part of HISTORY. We have to draw inspiration therefrom.

After the execution of Saddam Hussein,  the fact finding committee  finds out from the CIA chief that the intelligence inputs regarding the presence and manufacture of the WMDs was not factual. But by then it had become a fait-accompli.  Somebody owns up for the non-factual representation made, and he resigns and no further action against him is taken. To put it in simpler terms, the man who cooked the intelligence did give the so called proof (at that point in time) for the chief executive to act, in a way that he always wanted to. And to top it, after accomplishing the mission, he goes scot-free. The congress finds out that  he had furnished incorrect facts and thereby made the chief executive take a wrong decision!!

Cut back a few centuries, Warren Hastings and Dalhousie commit excesses in India, when the British Parliament finds that the public opinion was getting sticky, they call for the IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS against these Governors-General/Viceroy,  make a great forum for EDMUND BURKE and FOX to display their verbal skills and make vituperative speeches and then the  SOVEREIGN PARDON follows and the rogues are let free. No Indian gets to trouble those rogues in The Great Britain. They both lived happily everafter, with none to look down upon them.

IT IS EASIER TO GET PARDON THAN TO OBTAIN PERMISSION!

I HOPE, THAT WE LEARN THE LESSONS THAT HISTORY HAS TO OFFER, AND STRIKE THE ROOTS OF TERROR WHEREVER THEY BE, AND SUBSEQUENTLY FEEL SORRY- IF AT ALL WE HAVE TO. WHEN THE MEMORIES OF THE MUMBAI BLASTS ARE STILL FRESH, THE JUSTIFICATION WOULD BE HIGHER.

STATECRAFT IS HIGHER THAN INTERNATIONAL LAWS -WHICH ARE NOTHING BUT POST-FACTO FORMULATIONS TO DELAY AND DISSIPATE THE ANGER AND MERELY SETTLEMENT OF PAYMENTS. STATECRAFT IS ROOTED IN LIVES OF ITS CITIZENS, HONOUR AND SOVEREIGNTY.

YES WE CAN AND WE SHALL!!

Comments on: "MUMBAI TERRORISTS!" (2)

  1. I hope that the Indian people know that whatever Reverend Jeremiah Wright says it doesn’t represent the views of all of America. Lots of us in America see Jeremiah Wright as a source of shame and view him with contempt.

    I don’t feel that this is a case of India’s chickens coming home to roost. Lots of us in America would be appalled at hearing Reverend Jeremiah Wright say “God Damn India”.

    It really concerns me that such a low life is so close to our President-elect.

  2. hi JJ,
    I have to take serious exception to “….India’s chickens coming home to roost.” India never did export terrorism nor did it encourage terrorism for any cause whatever.
    So far as Rev. Jeremiah’s sermon on “chickens coming home to roost” is concerned, it is for the American citizens to react, as he was talking of the deeds of the USA. In fact, every erudite Indian is bothered about American people’s opinion -only to the extent as to predict the way the USA might move- neither sympathetically nor hatefully.
    If Rev Jeremiah says “God Damn India”, I’m sure that the God he believes is the same God who told Jonah that HE doesn’t want to destroy Nineveh without giving them ample opportunity to repent. Further India has population that is 4 times the USA and the Lord Almighty may not hearken to such puerile prayers. Even a person like Jonah’s wishes were not fulfilled, how much less a Jeremiah Wright!!
    We Indians are not appalled by such statements, as we are only recently found friends and it needs longer association to reach such sentiments.
    Yr Prez-elect had already distanced himself from that Rev. and I share none of yr concerns in that matter. Obama is ok.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: